Showing posts with label fashion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fashion. Show all posts

Thursday, April 24, 2008

the Gap is back?



...well, the Sartorialist says so. Looking online, they seem kind of the same as ever. Maybe a few less "what were you thinking?" pieces. The Gap has always been kind of bland to me, but I guess the reason they exist is to provide foundation pieces that anyone can look good in. Sweet, but kind of boring. Especially when fashion right now is all about oddity (it seems to me). Even their "European Collection" is kind of boring. Oh well. I really like the look above, but I'm pretty sure I've seen people at Mizzou sport it. And (as much as I love my state) if Missouri's doing it, something must be off in the design department.

Monday, March 24, 2008

St. Louis has a Fashion Week?


(stl-style.com)

Yeah, well, I guess we do, kind of. It was in the Metro section of the Post-Dispatch this morning. What?

St. Louis Fashion Week (website)

Some events will be held at the Contemporary Art Museum of St. Louis, which looks really legit. I'm excited about going there when I move back.

But most of the events are at the garish new Lumiere Place Casino down on the riverfront, a little north of the arch.

Oh well, at least it's something.

And, according to this blog, Kimora Lee Simmons (Baby Phat) will be headlining our fashion week. Oh gosh.

For some real St. Louis fashion, see STL-style.com Tshirts, they're wonderful (here).

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Color Forecasting


colors for Spring '08 (budgetfashionista.com)

This kind of stuff gets me really excited, being a Cultural Studies major. My friend from high school, Nancy, is at school at Colorado State in Fort Collins, studying Fashion (or something related, like Textile and Apparel Management). So she's doing a project on who gets to decide what colors are cool each season. This sounds like a conspiracy theory mixed with '1984', but such is life in the fashion industry, I suppose.

So who are these people? Well, one of the major groups is The Color Association of the United States

this is from the wikipedia article on them: "Many Color Cards or palettes are created for various industries each year. For each area of focus a committee panel is formed consisting of eight to twelve people, referred in the business as the "Color Czars." Each member of the committee performs their own research on what colors they feel will, should, dominate the next few years in that industry. The committee then convenes and they debate the merits of the member selections. In the end they choose 44 colors that will make it to the palette. According to Forecaster Ken Charbonneau, the process is a lot of debate before consensus."

Debate on what? Color fashion seems completely subjective to me. Yet, I know that I would not buy a tshirt that is mustard yellow right now but in 2 years I might paint my entire room that color. I am owned.

A list of the "Color Czars" (here).

Another major organization that decides these things (thank God there are more than one - we wouldn't want a monopoly) is Pantone.

In case you're curious, (here's) a huge PDF file from Pantone on what colors and styles are going to be cool for spring.

Monday, March 3, 2008

Little things



(link) Yep, those are the twin towers
  • don't wear skinny jeans with long underwear, it ruins the whole look, trust me.

  • fool proof way to get a guy to like you: be completely bored out of your mind and uninterested, yet polite.

  • look up this guy: Philippe Petit. I saw wonderful, glorious documentary about him: 'Man on Wire'

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

What the...

I don't know why on earth I care about what Oprah's favorite things are, but this is one of them. I just wanted to point out that this is the ugliest outfit I've seen all year, and I thought I'd share it with you:

Saturday, November 3, 2007

David Bowie at Target


While Date Night was at Six Flags around a month ago I saw some pretty stylish guys in line in front of us for Mr. Freeze and I started thinking. Target offers pretty cheap fashionable eclectic clothing for females, do they do the same for males? None of the rest of Date Night had had much experience in the men's section of Target and didn't know.

Well, I saw an ad yesterday for Keanan Duffty for Target. He designed a line for guys that is inspired by David Bowie. Yes. I love it. It's full of skinny ties and tuxedo shirts. About time that guys started dressing in weird and wonderful ways on a mass level.

It seems like Target really likes the whole idea of a generalized "Euro-chic" with tons of Union Jacks and odd patterns thrown together. I always wonder what the designer thinks when Target approaches them. "yes, it will put my designs in a place where lots of people can wear them (cool) but also it's going to be crappy quality (shoot) and in sizes not made for creepy heroin-chic models (distorted?). Oh well, why not."

He has really creepy models (see Fall 2006 here).

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Inspiration Nation

Great article from coolhunter.com on what globalization and our instant-access society has done to looking "cool"
(read it all here)



Getting inspired in today's culture is no easy task. It's hard to be fresh when fresh has become a commodity, when happiness has become fashionshaped, and fashion has shifted from niche pursuit to easy-access shorthand for cool. Like pulling up your hoodie to get an instant toughness boost or feeling 10% smarter because you've got new shoes on. The old signifiers of youth style and culture - music, and particularly, fashion? have become easy-access.

In short, everyone has become fashion-able. Not fashionable, you note, just able to grab hold of this week's trends with a lunchtime purchase of some cheap white pumps or a faux cameo necklace. Super-hip stylist Christiane Joy claims to have almost dropped out of the global in-on-Monday, out-by-Wednesday fashion roundabout, preferring jeans, a shirt and less obvious signals to her style: a pair of sneakers customized by a hip friend, or pumps in just the right shade of blue. Perhaps that's the answer - subtle as the new black. It's an argument that old-school music purists have had with the Limewire generation since the first Napster file-swap happened. Forget the days when it took commitment to get music (ever thought about how hard it was for Mick Jagger to get those Muddy Waters records?).

Recognizing true creativity when you see it, nourishing it and encouraging it to grow, is the only way to beat the frightening forces of things like the pop idol machine, high street fashion factories and lookalike magazines and models. Do your own thing, keep reaching up for those high ideas and never look over your shoulder; because that's what being fierce and being creative, is truly all about.
By Emma Warren and Elizabeth McGrath of Electronic Beats

Thursday, October 11, 2007

"Intimacy and Belonging" by David Brooks


I hardly ever read magazines. The two I do read aren't typical magazines: Lucky (a glorified catalogue), and the New Yorker (more short stories than anything). But I had to buy two at the bookstore for a Postmodernism class collage project. It's fascinating. I bought Adbusters and Flaunt.

In Adbusters they had a reprint of a David Brooks article. I love him. I liked Bobos in Paradise a lot and love his other articles. It talks about three songs that were on the radio this summer: "Before He Cheats" by Carrie Underwood, "U + Ur Hand" by Pink, and "Girlfriend" by Avril Lavigne.

..."If you put the songs together, you see they're about the same sort of character: a character who would have been socially unacceptable in a megahit pop song ten, let alone 30 years ago. This character is hard-boiled, foul-mouthed, fed up, emotionally self-sufficient and unforgiving. She's like one of those battle-hardened combat vets, who's had the sentimentality beaten out of her and who no longer has time for romance or etiquette. She's disgusted by male idiots and contemptuous of the feminine flirts who cater to them. She's also, at least in some of the songs, about 16. This character is obviously a product of the cold-eyed age of divorce and hookups...When Americans face something that's psychologically traumatic, they invent an autonomous Lone Ranger fantasy hero who can deal with it. The closing of the frontier brought us the hard-drinking cowboy loner (I'm learning about this in my Victorian class too - the close of the Frontier made everyone freak out like there was no danger or real life left, just tamed cities). Urbanization brought us the hard-drinking detective loner.
Now young people face a social frontier of their own. They hit puberty around 13 and many don't' get married until they're past 30. That's two decades of coupling, uncoupling, hooking up, relationships and shopping around. This period isn't a transition anymore. It's a sprawling life stage, and nobody knows the rules.
Once, young people came a-calling as part of courtship. Then they had dating and going steady. But the rules of courtship have dissolved. They've been replaced by ambiguity and uncertainty. Cellphones, Facebook and text messages give people access to hundreds of 'friends.' that only increases the fluidity, drama and anxiety.
Young people still need intimacy and belonging more than anything else. But the pose is the product of something real - a response to this new stage of formless premarital life, and the anxieties it produces...We imagine we can overcome the anxieties of society by posing as romantic lone wolves. The angry young women on the radio these days are not the first pop stars to romanticize independence for audiences desperate for companionship."
(See the full article)